BY: B. Keith Plunkett
Society has morphed into a mob that wants to hear our leaders definitively and emphatically say “never” and/or “always”. We get caught up in feel good phrases like “Yes We Can.” Empty and meaningless maxims discount one simple fact: none of us, not even those willing to shout such blather from the rooftops and podiums, are ever really in control.
We reward people as worthy of leadership for the pronouncement of meaningless platitudes. We use it to build an otherwise banal personality into a heroic figure and then lay at their doorstep our problems to be fixed. We want someone else to be the “go to guy”, because at our core, the majority of us are scared to stick out our own necks.
We are fearful little children, who learned to deal with life through our control dramas at a young age, and we have brought those dramas with us into adulthood. How do I get fed? I cry. How do I get my way? I throw a temper tantrum. How do I get out of this? I lie. How do I win? I cheat. Those are the standards of the playground in which we live. It is the ways we have deluded ourselves into maintaining the belief that we can control our situations. It is our lesser selves we revert to when focused on a shortcut to the end result. We have forgotten that we are not in control and never have been. We have allowed ourselves to become manipulators--and maninpulated, out of fear, out of laziness, out of aloofness, and in some cases out of blind allegiance to the perception of power.
That’s all power really is; a perception. Situational control, that is momentary management, will always lie with the person or group that is perceived to have power. That group and control will often change when that power is challenged, when a reaction to new circumstances is insufficient to maintain it, or when they begin to believe that they are above reproach. There are leaders and there are followers. Without belief there are no followers, and there can be no leaders without followers.
We deify those who say “never this” or “always that” and put them on a pedestal. But, when those heroes become all too human, as they inevitably do, those that believed in the miracle can only stand by quietly disappointed and watch as the axe is sharpened, usually by someone else who is shouting, “Never again!”
Then, the process starts anew.
We deify our demagogues, and then sacrifice them at the altar of their own failures when it is WE who have set the bar too high for them, while not even bothering to set a bar for ourselves.
We need a reawakening. We need a renewal of personal responsibility—not control, but responsibility. That doesn’t start with some political catchphrase. It starts with each of us. It begins at the most grassroots level, in our own backyard, and in our own communities. It starts by worrying about what we can do for others and relinquishing any hope at controlling the outcome, and by not scheming about what we need for ourselves or manipulating the situation to gain an edge. It starts with REAL public servants, those are people who are in it for the right reasons, people of courage, people prepared to help bring consensus to difficult issues to solve problems.
Politics reflects society. We get exactly what we deserve. Being courageous doesn’t require being obnoxious and building consensus isn’t the same as sacrificing principle. The path is narrow. It requires good balance to keep from falling off into the weeds.
Senator Chuck Hagel writes, "The quality of leaders and effectiveness of government are directly related to informed and committed citizens willing to participate in politics."
Nothing is accomplished by divisive avarice. Citizens should encourage good balance within our social networks and follow the leaders that naturally appear as a result.
Friday, November 19, 2010
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Bachmann Says NO to More Work
But, find a camera and she'll be there!
According to Politico, Ms. Bachmann was asked to be an appropriator next session and said thanks, but no thanks.
Ms. Bachmann presently sits on only ONE committee … the House Financial Services Committee … where she is a backbencher. Heck, even “rookie” legislators have more asssignments … Consider that Gregg Harper (R-MS) has just started his career in Congress this term and is assigned to four committees (Committee on the Budget, Committee on the Judiciary, Committee on House Administration, and Committee on Standards of Official Conduct). Or fellow freshman Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), who is assigned to the Judiciary; Natural Resources; Oversight & Government Reform Committees.
Ms. Bachmann is lazy. The Appropriations Committee is a demanding assignment … requiring long hours that can involve skillful diplomacy. It is a lot easier to let someone else do the work …
For all the TaxEnoughAlready folks who sent their hard-earned dollars to support Ms. Bachmann’s re-election should be asking for their monies back.
MNPoliticalRoundtable
According to Politico, Ms. Bachmann was asked to be an appropriator next session and said thanks, but no thanks.
Ms. Bachmann presently sits on only ONE committee … the House Financial Services Committee … where she is a backbencher. Heck, even “rookie” legislators have more asssignments … Consider that Gregg Harper (R-MS) has just started his career in Congress this term and is assigned to four committees (Committee on the Budget, Committee on the Judiciary, Committee on House Administration, and Committee on Standards of Official Conduct). Or fellow freshman Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), who is assigned to the Judiciary; Natural Resources; Oversight & Government Reform Committees.
Ms. Bachmann is lazy. The Appropriations Committee is a demanding assignment … requiring long hours that can involve skillful diplomacy. It is a lot easier to let someone else do the work …
For all the TaxEnoughAlready folks who sent their hard-earned dollars to support Ms. Bachmann’s re-election should be asking for their monies back.
MNPoliticalRoundtable
Blake Walley Memorial Benefit to be held December 18 in Flora
![]() |
| Blake Walley |
The Fish Fry event will be held at the Holcomb Airstrip AKA "Roothog International" on Highway 22 just west of Flora. Plates will be available from 11:30 until 5:00 for $5.00 each. There will also be drawings for prizes and a live and silent auction at 1:00. Two helicopter rides will be among the auction items. Live music will be provided by Crossin Dixon.
All donations go to help pay for final expenses. Amounts in excess of the goal will be donated to a local charity.
Longwitz receives endorsements from Governor and key leaders in Madison County
Governor Haley Barbour, Former Mississippi Republican Party Chairman Jim Herring, Madison County Sheriff Toby Trowbridge and Madison County State Representative Rita Martinson all supporting Will Longwitz in runoff election.
As the runoff election on Tuesday, November 23rd is just a few days away, Madison County Judge candidate Will Longwitz is pleased to announce that he has received the public support of several key Mississippi leaders.
Will Longwitz has received the support of Mississippi's Governor Haley Barbour as well as the former Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, Jim Herring, of Canton. Will Longwitz also has the support of Madison County Sheriff Toby Trowbridge and Madison County State Representative Rita Martinson.
In addition, today's edition of the Madison County Journal newspaper has encouraged readers to vote for Will Longwitz with the newspaper's endorsement titled "Will Longwitz for County Judge" that states, "Will Longwitz is a man of character who possesses solidly conservative ideals. Among other things, Longwitz understands the growing juvenile crime problem in Madison County and is committed to stopping bad behavior from becoming criminal behavior."
Governor Haley Barbour has given his support to Will Longwitz's campaign with the following statement: "There is an important judicial election in Madison County, and I hope you will vote for Will Longwitz. I know he will be a fair, impartial and effective judge for Madison County. Will worked hard for me after Hurricane Katrina, and I know he will work hard for you."
In a letter to the Madison County Herald newspaper, former Mississippi Republican Party Chairman, Jim Herring, of Canton, writes, "Will has shown me he is not afraid of hard work- an essential trait for any good Judge...Will has shown me that he has the proper temperament to be a good Judge, one that is calm, kind, fair and impartial, yet one that can also be firm and even courageous if necessary."
In January, Longwitz announced his campaign at the home of Andy & Karen Taggart of Madison. He promised to "do everything in his power to help keep Madison County safe and strong, and a great place to raise families."
Longwitz is a former federal prosecutor, a special prosecutor for Madison County, and has his law practice in Madison. He is now in a runoff to be held on Tuesday, November 23rd. Longwitz came in first place in the general election on November 2nd, 2010.
You can learn more about Will Longwitz and his campaign by visiting http://www.will4judge.com/
For more information, contact the campaign at (601) 707-8560
As the runoff election on Tuesday, November 23rd is just a few days away, Madison County Judge candidate Will Longwitz is pleased to announce that he has received the public support of several key Mississippi leaders.
Will Longwitz has received the support of Mississippi's Governor Haley Barbour as well as the former Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, Jim Herring, of Canton. Will Longwitz also has the support of Madison County Sheriff Toby Trowbridge and Madison County State Representative Rita Martinson.
In addition, today's edition of the Madison County Journal newspaper has encouraged readers to vote for Will Longwitz with the newspaper's endorsement titled "Will Longwitz for County Judge" that states, "Will Longwitz is a man of character who possesses solidly conservative ideals. Among other things, Longwitz understands the growing juvenile crime problem in Madison County and is committed to stopping bad behavior from becoming criminal behavior."
Governor Haley Barbour has given his support to Will Longwitz's campaign with the following statement: "There is an important judicial election in Madison County, and I hope you will vote for Will Longwitz. I know he will be a fair, impartial and effective judge for Madison County. Will worked hard for me after Hurricane Katrina, and I know he will work hard for you."
In a letter to the Madison County Herald newspaper, former Mississippi Republican Party Chairman, Jim Herring, of Canton, writes, "Will has shown me he is not afraid of hard work- an essential trait for any good Judge...Will has shown me that he has the proper temperament to be a good Judge, one that is calm, kind, fair and impartial, yet one that can also be firm and even courageous if necessary."
In January, Longwitz announced his campaign at the home of Andy & Karen Taggart of Madison. He promised to "do everything in his power to help keep Madison County safe and strong, and a great place to raise families."
Longwitz is a former federal prosecutor, a special prosecutor for Madison County, and has his law practice in Madison. He is now in a runoff to be held on Tuesday, November 23rd. Longwitz came in first place in the general election on November 2nd, 2010.
You can learn more about Will Longwitz and his campaign by visiting http://www.will4judge.com/
For more information, contact the campaign at (601) 707-8560
Labels:
Judicial Races,
Madison County,
Will Longwitz
Brown strikes a deal in public intoxication charge
Mississippi Department of Transportation executive director Larry "Butch" Brown has reached a plea deal with prosecutors that could see public intoxication charges dropped.
Brown was not in court this morning, but his attorney reached a deal with prosecutors in the charge of public intoxication arising from an incident at Beau Rivage Casino & Resort in July of this year.
Brown is to enter anger management classes and stay out of trouble. If he successfully completes the course, the charges against him will be dropped and his record expunged.
Read More: SH
Brown was not in court this morning, but his attorney reached a deal with prosecutors in the charge of public intoxication arising from an incident at Beau Rivage Casino & Resort in July of this year.
Brown is to enter anger management classes and stay out of trouble. If he successfully completes the course, the charges against him will be dropped and his record expunged.
Read More: SH
Storey wills Tri-County to OT victory, North State
As the Tri-County Academy Rebels gathered around Trainor Storey at midfield towards the end of regulation in their second round game with DeSoto last Friday his message was simple.
"I just told them that we were brothers and we were going to go down and score and win this one," Storey said. "There was no way they were keeping us out."
The senior was true to his word as he guided the Rebels down the field to tie the game in the final minute and pull off a miraculous 35-28 victory in overtime.
The win kept the Rebs undefeated at 13-0 and was the first loss of the season for DeSoto.
TCA moves on to face Tunica Academy in the Academy A North State Championship this Friday.
"I'm very proud of this team right now," said Coach David Blount. "Their running game was probably the best we faced this year but in the end, our kids rose to the occasion."
MCJ
"I just told them that we were brothers and we were going to go down and score and win this one," Storey said. "There was no way they were keeping us out."
The senior was true to his word as he guided the Rebels down the field to tie the game in the final minute and pull off a miraculous 35-28 victory in overtime.
The win kept the Rebs undefeated at 13-0 and was the first loss of the season for DeSoto.
TCA moves on to face Tunica Academy in the Academy A North State Championship this Friday.
"I'm very proud of this team right now," said Coach David Blount. "Their running game was probably the best we faced this year but in the end, our kids rose to the occasion."
MCJ
Labels:
Flora News,
Madison County,
Sports,
Tri County Academy
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Congressman Harper Re-elected by peers to GOP Steering Committee
U.S. Representative Gregg Harper today was re-elected to the Republican Steering Committee as the sophomore class representative. This select party committee, comprised of the Republican leadership and region and class elected representatives, is responsible for choosing committee chairmen and assigning committee seats to all Republican Members of the House of Representatives.
“I’m so honored to serve again on the Republican Steering Committee and I want to thank my classmates for instilling their trust in me to be a voice for the sophomore class,” said Harper. “I am eager to work with Republican leaders to advance our jobs agenda that focuses on reducing runaway federal spending and reforming Congress.”
As Republicans enter the majority, this committee position will allow Harper to advocate for his classmates with regard to their desired committee assignments for the 112th Congress and Mississippi’s two new Republican congressmen-elect.
“Mississippians have chosen two rising stars to join the Republican majority,” Harper added. “I am working closely with Representatives-elect Alan Nunnelee and Steven Palazzo to help them gain seats on committees that will benefit both their district and our state.”
The Republican Steering Committee will settle committee rosters when the 112th Congress convenes in January, although committee chairmen may be selected later this month or in December.
Harper currently serves as the only freshman on the Committee on House Administration and the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct (Ethics). In addition, he serves on the Budget and Judiciary Committees.
“I’m so honored to serve again on the Republican Steering Committee and I want to thank my classmates for instilling their trust in me to be a voice for the sophomore class,” said Harper. “I am eager to work with Republican leaders to advance our jobs agenda that focuses on reducing runaway federal spending and reforming Congress.”
As Republicans enter the majority, this committee position will allow Harper to advocate for his classmates with regard to their desired committee assignments for the 112th Congress and Mississippi’s two new Republican congressmen-elect.
“Mississippians have chosen two rising stars to join the Republican majority,” Harper added. “I am working closely with Representatives-elect Alan Nunnelee and Steven Palazzo to help them gain seats on committees that will benefit both their district and our state.”
The Republican Steering Committee will settle committee rosters when the 112th Congress convenes in January, although committee chairmen may be selected later this month or in December.
Harper currently serves as the only freshman on the Committee on House Administration and the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct (Ethics). In addition, he serves on the Budget and Judiciary Committees.
Labels:
Congressman Gregg Harper,
GOP,
US House
Madison County woman charged in insurance fraud
A Madison County woman is behind bars today facing charges she committed insurance fraud, announced Attorney General Jim Hood.
Johnnetta White, 23, of Camden, was arrested by the Madison County Sheriff's Office today following an investigation by the Mississippi Attorney General's Public Integrity Division/Insurance Fraud Unit.
White was indicted in Madison County on a single count of Insurance Fraud after she allegedly filed a fraudulent automobile insurance claim.
White was under house arrest at the time of the offense for a 2009 conviction in Madison County for embezzlement.
CL
Johnnetta White, 23, of Camden, was arrested by the Madison County Sheriff's Office today following an investigation by the Mississippi Attorney General's Public Integrity Division/Insurance Fraud Unit.
White was indicted in Madison County on a single count of Insurance Fraud after she allegedly filed a fraudulent automobile insurance claim.
White was under house arrest at the time of the offense for a 2009 conviction in Madison County for embezzlement.
CL
House Republicans Elect Leadership Team for the 112th Congress
The Members-elect of the House Republican Conference met today to select leaders for the 112th Congress.
The results of those elections are as follows:
• Speaker of the House: John A. Boehner of Ohio
• Republican Leader: Eric Cantor of Virginia
• Republican Whip: Kevin McCarthy of California
• Republican Conference Chairman: Jeb Hensarling of Texas
• National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman: Pete Sessions of Texas
• Republican Policy Committee Chairman: Tom Price of Georgia
• Republican Conference Vice-Chair: Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington
• Republican Conference Secretary: John Carter of Texas
• Freshman Elected Leadership Representative: Kristi Noem of South Dakota
• Freshman Elected Leadership Representative: Tim Scott of South Carolina
The results of those elections are as follows:
• Speaker of the House: John A. Boehner of Ohio
• Republican Leader: Eric Cantor of Virginia
• Republican Whip: Kevin McCarthy of California
• Republican Conference Chairman: Jeb Hensarling of Texas
• National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman: Pete Sessions of Texas
• Republican Policy Committee Chairman: Tom Price of Georgia
• Republican Conference Vice-Chair: Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington
• Republican Conference Secretary: John Carter of Texas
• Freshman Elected Leadership Representative: Kristi Noem of South Dakota
• Freshman Elected Leadership Representative: Tim Scott of South Carolina
Laforge: Earmark Moratorium will have NO impact on the federal budget.
BY: Bill Laforge
Yesterday the Senate Republican conference agreed on a two-year moratorium on earmarks. Republican Leader Mitch McConnell reluctantly changed his position of supporting earmarks, went along with the party’s conservative wing, and embraced the idea of a moratorium, thus ensuring the endorsement of the Republican caucus, and avoiding a bitter and devisive intra-party battle. This is all in reaction to the election and to voter interests in the government, especially the Congress, doing everything possible to reduce spending and get the financial house in order. Congressional Republican leaders feel it is necessary to restore trust in government by the American people.
However, in reality, it is a mere symbolic gesture…a political reaction and a “feel-good” outcome for politicians who believe that they must listen to the American people and do their will on this issue. It will have NO impact on the federal budget. Earmarks are not “new” money. They only direct where the money will be spent. Essentially, they are directives from Congress on how taxpayers’ dollars should be spent, rather than allowing executive branch agencies to make all the decisions. The same amount of dollars will still be on the table and will be spent. The sad difference now is that Congress is abdicating its constitutional responsibility and privilege regarding the power of the purse, and turning over all the decisions to the executive branch. To me, this is very short-sighted. But it is an issue rife with demagoguery and political messaging. Politicians are falling all over themselves trying to outdo their rivals on this issue, so you will note that an unlikely coalition involving the President and congressional Republicans is having a field day with this issue. For many, perception has become reality, and it appears that the moratorium is real, at least for now.
The Senate action by Republicans comes on the heels of similar action by House Republicans earlier this year. It remains to be seen how congressional Democrats in both houses will respond and what they will do next. It is possible that all or some Democrats, and possibly even some Republicans, will continue to request earmarks. Politically I would envision Republicans making any Democratic earmarks a big issue during the next campaign. Hell hath no fury like a reformed earmarker! Only time will tell.
Bill LaForge is an attorney, Washington, D.C. office managing shareholder and Government Relations Practice Group leader with Winstead PC. A Cleveland, Mississippi native, Laforge was chief counsel of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, and culminated his government career as Chief Legislative Counsel and Chief of Staff to United States Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi.
Yesterday the Senate Republican conference agreed on a two-year moratorium on earmarks. Republican Leader Mitch McConnell reluctantly changed his position of supporting earmarks, went along with the party’s conservative wing, and embraced the idea of a moratorium, thus ensuring the endorsement of the Republican caucus, and avoiding a bitter and devisive intra-party battle. This is all in reaction to the election and to voter interests in the government, especially the Congress, doing everything possible to reduce spending and get the financial house in order. Congressional Republican leaders feel it is necessary to restore trust in government by the American people.
However, in reality, it is a mere symbolic gesture…a political reaction and a “feel-good” outcome for politicians who believe that they must listen to the American people and do their will on this issue. It will have NO impact on the federal budget. Earmarks are not “new” money. They only direct where the money will be spent. Essentially, they are directives from Congress on how taxpayers’ dollars should be spent, rather than allowing executive branch agencies to make all the decisions. The same amount of dollars will still be on the table and will be spent. The sad difference now is that Congress is abdicating its constitutional responsibility and privilege regarding the power of the purse, and turning over all the decisions to the executive branch. To me, this is very short-sighted. But it is an issue rife with demagoguery and political messaging. Politicians are falling all over themselves trying to outdo their rivals on this issue, so you will note that an unlikely coalition involving the President and congressional Republicans is having a field day with this issue. For many, perception has become reality, and it appears that the moratorium is real, at least for now.
The Senate action by Republicans comes on the heels of similar action by House Republicans earlier this year. It remains to be seen how congressional Democrats in both houses will respond and what they will do next. It is possible that all or some Democrats, and possibly even some Republicans, will continue to request earmarks. Politically I would envision Republicans making any Democratic earmarks a big issue during the next campaign. Hell hath no fury like a reformed earmarker! Only time will tell.
Bill LaForge is an attorney, Washington, D.C. office managing shareholder and Government Relations Practice Group leader with Winstead PC. A Cleveland, Mississippi native, Laforge was chief counsel of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, and culminated his government career as Chief Legislative Counsel and Chief of Staff to United States Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi.
Labels:
Congress,
Earmarks,
Federal Government,
Government Spending
Tea Party Fuels Born-Again Earmark Opponents
Tuesday's Republican vote on imposing an earmark moratorium was a direct response to the rising influence of Tea Party conservatives in the Senate. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), the de facto leader of the Tea Party Senate caucus, said "the significance of this policy victory cannot be overstated" in an e-mail to supporters.
But a close look at Tuesday's voice vote to impose a non-binding moratorium on earmarks not only showcases the Tea Party's clout in the Senate this year, but its significant influence in GOP primary politics in 2012 and beyond.
Several Republican senators who are up for re-election in 2012 and who have previously sought millions in earmarks reversed course on Tuesday to vote for the measure -- a move for some that was undoubtedly intended to shore up their right flank in 2012. And even newly elected moderate Republican senators, like Illinois' Mark Kirk and New Hampshire's Kelly Ayotte, backed the measure, an indication that the politics of opposing earmarks is now viewed in the GOP as a clear political winner.
"Part of a politician's DNA is to talk out of both sides of their mouths," said Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense, an organization that opposes earmarks. "So it's not surprising that they have put their fingers into the political wind and sensed it has changed directions on earmarks."
Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker (R) is another surprising supporter of the moratorium. A veteran appropriator, Wicker requested $384 million worth of earmarks in 2010, in a state that's relied on federal funds for its military bases and shipyards, among other projects. But he's up for re-election in 2012, and his support of the moratorium is probably with a primary challenger in mind.
HL
But a close look at Tuesday's voice vote to impose a non-binding moratorium on earmarks not only showcases the Tea Party's clout in the Senate this year, but its significant influence in GOP primary politics in 2012 and beyond.
Several Republican senators who are up for re-election in 2012 and who have previously sought millions in earmarks reversed course on Tuesday to vote for the measure -- a move for some that was undoubtedly intended to shore up their right flank in 2012. And even newly elected moderate Republican senators, like Illinois' Mark Kirk and New Hampshire's Kelly Ayotte, backed the measure, an indication that the politics of opposing earmarks is now viewed in the GOP as a clear political winner.
"Part of a politician's DNA is to talk out of both sides of their mouths," said Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense, an organization that opposes earmarks. "So it's not surprising that they have put their fingers into the political wind and sensed it has changed directions on earmarks."
Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker (R) is another surprising supporter of the moratorium. A veteran appropriator, Wicker requested $384 million worth of earmarks in 2010, in a state that's relied on federal funds for its military bases and shipyards, among other projects. But he's up for re-election in 2012, and his support of the moratorium is probably with a primary challenger in mind.
HL
Labels:
Earmarks,
Federal Government,
GOP,
Government Spending,
Politics,
TEA Party,
US Senate
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Stick a fork in Steele, he's done!
The articles I posted in April and July of this year should have been a pretty good indication of what was to come. More proof that Affirmative Action is a bad idea!
Top RNC Aide Slams Steele For Failed FundraisingHL
Republican National Committee political director Gentry Collins offered an abrupt resignation Tuesday, coupled with a stinging rebuke of Chairman Michael Steele and the committee's fundraising efforts in the midterm elections.
In a five-page letter to Steele and members of the RNC's executive committee, Collins said the party's lackluster fundraising effort contributed just a fraction of the amount of money to state parties that it had in previous cycles. That financial downturn, Collins said, prevented Republicans from capitalizing on an historic wave election and allowed Democrats to hold on in key races.
Collins' public rebuke of Steele's tenure is the latest indication that there are serious divisions within the RNC and that Steele, who is seeking a second term, will face a tough battle to hang on to the job.
Steele hired Collins, a top Republican operative who worked for former Gov. Mitt Romney in the 2008 cycle, in an effort to reassure donors and committee members that he was building an effective operation with seasoned and competent people in key roles. Collins is the latest staffer to leave disgruntled, but the first to have done so in such a public manner.
"Sadly, if left on its current path, the RNC will not be a productive force in the 2012 campaign," wrote Collins. "During the 2010 cycle, the RNC allowed its major donor base to wither."
Collins said the fundraising operation was ineffective, handing out a relative pittance to state parties and candidates while spending more money to raise less. Big donors who gave more than $1,000 contributed just 10.5 percent of the committee's fundraising, an incredible drop-off from recent years.
Meanwhile, Collins revealed the RNC has drawn down $15 million it had secured in lines of credit, and that unpaid bills owed by the committee are "likely to add millions to that debt." The money went to expenses other than the political department, which for the first time since the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill was passed did not fund an independent expenditure program.
What's more, even standard programs developed over decades failed to materialize. The RNC's 72-hour program of turning out voters "was left largely un-funded," Collins wrote, as RNC chief of staff Mike Leavitt withheld funding from states until October 22, a week before those funds were to be implemented.
The lack of funds had a real impact, Collins argued, contributing to Republican losses in Democratic-held seats the party might otherwise have contested. Collins points to 21 House races, stretching from Washington State to Arizona to New York and North Carolina, that the party left on the table, as well as to Senate races in Washington and Colorado and governorships in Vermont, Minnesota and Connecticut.
The 2012 elections represent "huge opportunities requiring massive obligations," Collins wrote. "And this Committee can meet them. But to meet them, we must dig out from huge debts, be focused and disciplined about spending wisely, only spend to win elections, and adopt a laser-like focus on the hard work of reviving our major donor fundraising network."
Collins' public rebuke is stunning in that he has shied away from ever commenting about the internal workings of the party. While staffers, former staffers and committee members have complained, Collins refused to speak with the press except on a handful of occasions while briefing reporters at committee meetings.
Labels:
Affirmative Action,
GOP,
Michael Steele,
Politics,
RNC
We know how to get out of this mess. But, how much more damage gets done until then?
BY: B. Keith Plunkett
Even those of us with a little history of being on the wrong side of the political witch hunters in Madison County—one day, I’ll write that story and explain—have to look at the past few months of shenanigans with mouths agape in amazement. There is no definitive starting point, and apparently no ending point, to the political gamesmanship that occurs here in the “Land Between Two Rivers”. It goes back decades. But, if one were to try to define a timeline of events that have us where we are today, the ramp-up to our most recent toxic political climate can be traced back to February 2006 when Board President Tim Johnson and Supervisor’s Karl Banks and Paul Griffin formed a voting bloc and passed a $50 million bond debt program without knowing how the county would pay it back. That lack of budget sense was followed by a vote again in September 2008 to raise taxes to the tune of 3.3 mils to cover the debt that was incurred from it.
Before the 2008 vote, there was an attempt to stifle debate altogether by closing the public hearing, followed by a surprisingly inept attempt to double the increase to 6.33 mils. Due to public outcry and the threat of legal challenges, it was quickly reduced back to the original 3.33 mils. But a new way of doing business had been put into play:
Wary citizens talk of the lack of open government and restraint in Canton reached the stratosphere by 2009. One road project that had fallen out of favor within the newly developed road plan was holding up development in the City of Madison and Mayor Mary Hawkins-Butler began a closer look at the county spending. The result was notice of potential double-dipping by County Engineer Rudy Warnock in his billing practices with subcontractors.
A subsequent report by an independent engineering consultant, Richard McAfee, funded by concerned citizens in the City of Madison found several red flags in Warnock’s cozy relationship with Madison County. The allegations became public in March of 2010, and calls for a visit from State Auditor Stacey Pickering ensued. Board President Johnson and Warnock looked on that as the seminal shot fired. With the help of the voting bloc that now controlled the Board of Supervisors, they began implementing a scorched earth retaliation policy, and a game of “hide-and-go-seek” of the county’s invoice approval process.
It has engulfed the county’s business ever since. Now including Board Attorney Eric Hamer’s billing practices:
The questions of financial irresponsibility also extends to questions over the salary of lobbyist C. Steven Seale, and even if his employment is legal under Mississippi code. Nothing at this point appears to be viewed outside the prism of doubt and mistrust.
I’d be willing to bet that former County Administrator Donnie Caughman and Comptroller Mark Houston are happy as two pigs in slop that they got out when they did.
The latest installment of the timeline has the Board of Supervisor’s trying to lock Supervisor D.I. Smith out of any executive sessions by charging him with leaking sensitive legal information to MDOT regarding one of the privately planned road projects.
The tactic employed by Johnson and company is to deny everything, admit to nothing, and to lay waste to everything through counter charges. There is a void left from the board’s refusal to come clean, and citizens are left guessing at why this is all happening. The vacuum created by a Board of Supervisor's unwilling to explain themselves is filled by any number of rumors.
There is Supervisor Banks land holdings and the question of whether he has personally profited from his votes on the board. There have been concerns of the possible uber-politicization of the upcoming redistricting process to allow the control of the power levers to remain in Johnson’s hands as, are you sitting down . . . County Administrator. That's right folks, rumor is he has his sight set on a job to run the whole county; Boss Hogg in a sequened jumpsuit.
As puzzled citizens scratch their heads, old rumors of the county engineer’s epic shindigs have again been brought to the fore, as well. Warnock’s soiree’s, the rumor goes, supposedly helped him gain enough dirt on public officials that he could get away with the billing deceptions and the closed door road planning meetings. No one would dare cross him lest he go public.
Is this all true? I’m not sure. There is almost always a hint of truth in the most deceptive of lies. That’s what makes them believable. But one thing is for certain; the fact that it is all being talked about as the back story to the ongoing head-butting between factions is not financially or civically healthy for any of us.
This is what we Madison Countians have been reduced to by the mismanagement of a few who want all the power all the time. It didn't just start this year, and it won’t be fixed overnight. Most voters probably now realize it will require some serious purging come Election Day before that fix is possible.
The question becomes, “Can Madison County keep from imploding until then?”
Even those of us with a little history of being on the wrong side of the political witch hunters in Madison County—one day, I’ll write that story and explain—have to look at the past few months of shenanigans with mouths agape in amazement. There is no definitive starting point, and apparently no ending point, to the political gamesmanship that occurs here in the “Land Between Two Rivers”. It goes back decades. But, if one were to try to define a timeline of events that have us where we are today, the ramp-up to our most recent toxic political climate can be traced back to February 2006 when Board President Tim Johnson and Supervisor’s Karl Banks and Paul Griffin formed a voting bloc and passed a $50 million bond debt program without knowing how the county would pay it back. That lack of budget sense was followed by a vote again in September 2008 to raise taxes to the tune of 3.3 mils to cover the debt that was incurred from it.
Before the 2008 vote, there was an attempt to stifle debate altogether by closing the public hearing, followed by a surprisingly inept attempt to double the increase to 6.33 mils. Due to public outcry and the threat of legal challenges, it was quickly reduced back to the original 3.33 mils. But a new way of doing business had been put into play:
Johnson, who said he worked with an “ad hoc” committee comprised of County Engineer Rudy Warnock and road department officials to develop the plan, said he intentionally did not solicit input from either Jones or Taggart. Johnson, who said he did not need public input to determine the county’s greatest transportation needs, said he did discuss the plan and how best to finance the individual road projects chosen as priorities with District 4 Supervisor Karl Banks and District 5 Supervisor Paul Griffin.Plans for the future had been made behind closed doors. It was a sign of things to come.
“They were a part of it, yes,” Johnson said.
Warnock, who formally drafted the presentation document outlining almost $100 million in road construction and repair projects, was approved as part of the road plan’s 3 to 2 adoption to serve as the lead engineer for the entire road plan project – a responsibility that could potentially earn his engineering firm up to 20 percent of the road projects’ total costs.
“I will be the lead engineer for the road work,” Warnock said.
“It’s what the board decided.”
Wary citizens talk of the lack of open government and restraint in Canton reached the stratosphere by 2009. One road project that had fallen out of favor within the newly developed road plan was holding up development in the City of Madison and Mayor Mary Hawkins-Butler began a closer look at the county spending. The result was notice of potential double-dipping by County Engineer Rudy Warnock in his billing practices with subcontractors.
A subsequent report by an independent engineering consultant, Richard McAfee, funded by concerned citizens in the City of Madison found several red flags in Warnock’s cozy relationship with Madison County. The allegations became public in March of 2010, and calls for a visit from State Auditor Stacey Pickering ensued. Board President Johnson and Warnock looked on that as the seminal shot fired. With the help of the voting bloc that now controlled the Board of Supervisors, they began implementing a scorched earth retaliation policy, and a game of “hide-and-go-seek” of the county’s invoice approval process.
It has engulfed the county’s business ever since. Now including Board Attorney Eric Hamer’s billing practices:
The questions of financial irresponsibility also extends to questions over the salary of lobbyist C. Steven Seale, and even if his employment is legal under Mississippi code. Nothing at this point appears to be viewed outside the prism of doubt and mistrust.
I’d be willing to bet that former County Administrator Donnie Caughman and Comptroller Mark Houston are happy as two pigs in slop that they got out when they did.
The latest installment of the timeline has the Board of Supervisor’s trying to lock Supervisor D.I. Smith out of any executive sessions by charging him with leaking sensitive legal information to MDOT regarding one of the privately planned road projects.
The tactic employed by Johnson and company is to deny everything, admit to nothing, and to lay waste to everything through counter charges. There is a void left from the board’s refusal to come clean, and citizens are left guessing at why this is all happening. The vacuum created by a Board of Supervisor's unwilling to explain themselves is filled by any number of rumors.
There is Supervisor Banks land holdings and the question of whether he has personally profited from his votes on the board. There have been concerns of the possible uber-politicization of the upcoming redistricting process to allow the control of the power levers to remain in Johnson’s hands as, are you sitting down . . . County Administrator. That's right folks, rumor is he has his sight set on a job to run the whole county; Boss Hogg in a sequened jumpsuit.
As puzzled citizens scratch their heads, old rumors of the county engineer’s epic shindigs have again been brought to the fore, as well. Warnock’s soiree’s, the rumor goes, supposedly helped him gain enough dirt on public officials that he could get away with the billing deceptions and the closed door road planning meetings. No one would dare cross him lest he go public.
Is this all true? I’m not sure. There is almost always a hint of truth in the most deceptive of lies. That’s what makes them believable. But one thing is for certain; the fact that it is all being talked about as the back story to the ongoing head-butting between factions is not financially or civically healthy for any of us.
This is what we Madison Countians have been reduced to by the mismanagement of a few who want all the power all the time. It didn't just start this year, and it won’t be fixed overnight. Most voters probably now realize it will require some serious purging come Election Day before that fix is possible.
The question becomes, “Can Madison County keep from imploding until then?”
Johnson's Cabal does away with all pretense of good government.
Tim Johnson and his friends on the Madison County Board of Supervisors have stopped acting as if they care, deciding to boot Supervisor D.I. Smith from Executive Sessions. They have worked behind closed doors from the public for so long, apparently now they want to rid themselves of the distractions while they systematically dismantle decades of work in one of the most promising counties in the state.
Madison County board says D.I. Smith e-mailed suit plans
Madison County board says D.I. Smith e-mailed suit plans
A Madison County supervisor is accused of leaking information from a closed session that could impact a lawsuit against the Mississippi Department of Transportation.CL
Supervisor D.I. Smith faced allegations from fellow supervisors Monday during a board meeting.
On a 4-1 vote, with Smith in opposition, the Board of Supervisors agreed to have Board attorney Eric Hamer seek the opinion of the attorney general or the ethics commission on barring Smith from any executive sessions in which the MDOT lawsuit is discussed.
"He's shown he can't be trusted in this matter," board President Tim Johnson said in seeking to bar Smith.
Smith, however, said he has done nothing wrong and called the board's attempt to censure him "simply politics in Madison County.
"I'm not aware I disclosed any information I wasn't supposed to," Smith said.
The county is asking MDOT to pay back $20 million local officials said was lost when the county decided not to build an I-55 interchange for Reunion Parkway. Smith has said he thinks the suit is a waste of the county's money.
However, Mississippi Ethics Commission Executive Director Tom Hood said state law does not keep an elected official from discussing what occurred behind closed doors.
"Discussing what happens in executive session is not a violation of the open meetings act or the ethics in government law," Hood said.
Bond Denied For Mother Charged In Newborn's Death
Police: Baby Was Found Inside Suitcase
A Madison County Circuit Court judge on Monday denied bond for a 41-year-old woman charged in the death of her newborn son.
Sheila Ealey is charged with murder, court officials said. She was recently indicted by a Madison County grand jury.
Madison County Sheriff's Department investigators believe Ealey gave birth to the boy in July. She's accused of wrapping the baby in a plastic bag and putting him in a suitcase, which was found behind Smith Chapel Baptist Church in Flora, police said.
Related Posts: Coroner: Baby Found Dead In Suitcase Behind Flora Church
Arrest made in dead baby case
Madison County DA: Baby was alive when dumped in Flora
Bond set in Madison baby death case
A Madison County Circuit Court judge on Monday denied bond for a 41-year-old woman charged in the death of her newborn son.
Sheila Ealey is charged with murder, court officials said. She was recently indicted by a Madison County grand jury.
Madison County Sheriff's Department investigators believe Ealey gave birth to the boy in July. She's accused of wrapping the baby in a plastic bag and putting him in a suitcase, which was found behind Smith Chapel Baptist Church in Flora, police said.
Related Posts: Coroner: Baby Found Dead In Suitcase Behind Flora Church
Arrest made in dead baby case
Madison County DA: Baby was alive when dumped in Flora
Bond set in Madison baby death case
Friday, November 12, 2010
3BP Analysis: Haley Barbour the man to beat in 2012
Haley Barbour is running for President.
No, he hasn't announced yet, but his intentions are well understood.
The best thing that happened to Haley Barbour and his aspirations for the presidency came when Mark Sanford decided to be an idiot. When Sanford was knocked from his post as head of the Republican Governors Association, Barbour took over and turned it into a powerhouse.
When all was said and done, the RGA had plenty to brag about come November 3rd.
Republican Governors have won control of the majority of 2012 swing states. The following states that held gubernatorial races are considered swing states: Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The RGA spent $49.5 million in these 10 swing states we deemed critical to 2012.
And while it's not a swing state, the RGA also was forced to move into South Carolina and provide some reinforcements to ensure Nikki Haley's victory.
Hmmm.
There's something awfully interesting about some of the states listed above.
Iowa. Nevada. South Carolina.
Well, it just so happens that the GOP primary calendar undertook some slight revisions this past year in order to guarantee four states had the first primaries.
New Hampshire. Iowa. Nevada. South Carolina.
Additionally, the new calendar emphasizes the importance of delaying the beginning of primary season and ensuring there isn't a kind of national primary that provides a candidate with an insurmountable lead.
Now no one would think a man with as heavy a drawl as Barbour could compete in New Hampshire. But Iowa, Nevada, and South Carolina? Those seem like decent possibilities.
Now take into consideration the massive amount of political capital Barbour gained among the new Governors in each of those three states by investing so heavily into their races. Branstad, Sandoval, and Haley all owe Haley Barbour. And they owe him big.
Is it enough to bring a hugely important endorsement? That much is unclear, but Barbour clearly has every reason and right to put the pressure on all three.
Now consider what happens if Barbour is able to finagle the early endorsements of people like Corbett, Kasich, and Scott in PA, OH, and FL. In the horserace that is primary politics, that provides quite a momentum shift.
No one doubts Barbour can raise money. No one doubts his abilities as a tactician. His record in Mississippi is exemplary. The only question is his background as a lobbyist and I'm not quite convinced that's the Achilles Heel many seem to believe.
If Barbour can manage to pull down these endorsements, watch out. Without a doubt, he'll be the man to beat for the 2012 GOP nomination.
3BP
No, he hasn't announced yet, but his intentions are well understood.
The best thing that happened to Haley Barbour and his aspirations for the presidency came when Mark Sanford decided to be an idiot. When Sanford was knocked from his post as head of the Republican Governors Association, Barbour took over and turned it into a powerhouse.
When all was said and done, the RGA had plenty to brag about come November 3rd.
Republican Governors have won control of the majority of 2012 swing states. The following states that held gubernatorial races are considered swing states: Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The RGA spent $49.5 million in these 10 swing states we deemed critical to 2012.
And while it's not a swing state, the RGA also was forced to move into South Carolina and provide some reinforcements to ensure Nikki Haley's victory.
Hmmm.
There's something awfully interesting about some of the states listed above.
Iowa. Nevada. South Carolina.
Well, it just so happens that the GOP primary calendar undertook some slight revisions this past year in order to guarantee four states had the first primaries.
New Hampshire. Iowa. Nevada. South Carolina.
Additionally, the new calendar emphasizes the importance of delaying the beginning of primary season and ensuring there isn't a kind of national primary that provides a candidate with an insurmountable lead.
Now no one would think a man with as heavy a drawl as Barbour could compete in New Hampshire. But Iowa, Nevada, and South Carolina? Those seem like decent possibilities.
Now take into consideration the massive amount of political capital Barbour gained among the new Governors in each of those three states by investing so heavily into their races. Branstad, Sandoval, and Haley all owe Haley Barbour. And they owe him big.
Is it enough to bring a hugely important endorsement? That much is unclear, but Barbour clearly has every reason and right to put the pressure on all three.
Now consider what happens if Barbour is able to finagle the early endorsements of people like Corbett, Kasich, and Scott in PA, OH, and FL. In the horserace that is primary politics, that provides quite a momentum shift.
No one doubts Barbour can raise money. No one doubts his abilities as a tactician. His record in Mississippi is exemplary. The only question is his background as a lobbyist and I'm not quite convinced that's the Achilles Heel many seem to believe.
If Barbour can manage to pull down these endorsements, watch out. Without a doubt, he'll be the man to beat for the 2012 GOP nomination.
3BP
Harper meets with President of Taiwan in Taipei
President Ma Ying-jeou said Thursday that his administration's cross-Taiwan Strait policy, including signing of an Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) between the two sides, has won recognition worldwide.
During a brief meeting with visiting American Congressman Gregg Harper (R-MS) and his wife at the Presidential Office, Ma said he feels pleased that the China policies implemented by his administration since he took office in May 2008 have gained the support of United States President Barack Obama and his predecessor George W. Bush.
In addition to serving to consolidate business and trade ties between China and Taiwan, Ma said the ECFA, which is something like a free trade agreement, has also helped ease tensions across the Taiwan Strait, formerly considered one of the world's flash points.
Ma told his visitors that he believes the peace-maker image that Taiwan has built will be conducive to its integration into the international community.
The president also took time to reiterate his aspirations for closer ties between Taiwan and the U.S., including Taiwan's acquisition of advanced F-16C/D jet fighters from the U.S., the signing of an extradition agreement between the two countries, and the U.S. waiving visas for visiting Taiwanese.
FT
During a brief meeting with visiting American Congressman Gregg Harper (R-MS) and his wife at the Presidential Office, Ma said he feels pleased that the China policies implemented by his administration since he took office in May 2008 have gained the support of United States President Barack Obama and his predecessor George W. Bush.
In addition to serving to consolidate business and trade ties between China and Taiwan, Ma said the ECFA, which is something like a free trade agreement, has also helped ease tensions across the Taiwan Strait, formerly considered one of the world's flash points.
Ma told his visitors that he believes the peace-maker image that Taiwan has built will be conducive to its integration into the international community.
The president also took time to reiterate his aspirations for closer ties between Taiwan and the U.S., including Taiwan's acquisition of advanced F-16C/D jet fighters from the U.S., the signing of an extradition agreement between the two countries, and the U.S. waiving visas for visiting Taiwanese.
FT
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Seale says he'll answer a few questions . . . so let's ask a few.
![]() |
| Seale |
"I can't explain each and every action or the propriety of my fees to every taxpayer in Madison County."And why not? It's really simple, just answer the questions.
Seriously though, I do understand. If he doesn't take direction from anybody but the Board of Supervisors, that's fine. I feel like we're making a little progress here. So, I'll be flexible.
Seale Says:
"What I will offer to do is to explain the work I do to you and give examples of the work and fees charged by similarly-situated entities for the same kind of work in Washington and Jackson. This is the same thing I've done for the Board since I was hired and have been supported in every instance by a 4-1 vote. It will then be up to you to make your own conclusions if you choose to participate and to report on what we've discussed for your benefit and for the benefit of your readers. Call me if this interests you."This doesn't exactly sound like a willingness to answer questions, but rather to "explain things" to me. In fact, "examples of the work and fees charged by similarly-situated entities for the same kind of work" sounds eerily like that inner government audit done by the county that tried to explain away Mr. Warnock's engineering fees, doesn't it?
But, when I said I wanted to turn this into "food for thought" I meant it. So, you have my attention, Mr. Seale.
Of course, we'll have to set some ground rules. But, I'm going to move ahead on the assumption that I get to ask a few questions. And, since I had hoped my readers here could ask a few in an open thread, what I'll do instead is offer this up as a thread for readers to send the questions to me. If I can get Mr. Seale to answer them, I'll do my best.
We'll see. Mr. Seale, I'll be in touch.
You ask 'em, I'll ask 'em, readers. So shoot.
Grassroots conservative movements will move Mississippi's local officials to GOP
BY: B. Keith Plunkett
Last night I attended a lecture by Andy Taggart and Jere Nash at Millsaps. The lecture was part of Millsaps Art and Lecture Series, something I was completely unaware of until late last week. That’s when I found out about this particular appearance by the two proprietors of the Red/Blue Review. Andy and Jere have grown their partnership into quite the informative franchise, with books, a popular blog and a regular weekly appearance on WLBT. Last night’s lecture had a particular focus on analyzing the elections from last week, and a look ahead to Mississippi’s 2011 statewide elections.
I was somewhat disappointed to find that I and only a few others were easily the youngest in the room of about 50 people. I won’t go into detail except to say that I am firmly planted now in the category of “middle-age.” With the exception of my 18-year old son, there appeared to be no one under the age of 25 in the room, and only a few that may have been under 40.
This is a sad state of affairs. Where are all the young Political Science majors? Where are the same young people that are easily found mulling about and schmoozing with cocktail in hand at any number of political fundraising parties? Where are the young professionals? The answer to that question may also give an idea of why, even in a huge turnout year for mid-term elections, we still have an abysmal number of actual voters participating in the process. Citizen engagement drives the debate, and drives participation by people who will be true public servants.
The lack of citizen-representatives, and the continuing progression towards exclusivity in party-centric ideas was part of the reason for a huge backlash this year from the TEA party, 9-12 groups and other grassroots efforts. The movement has registered huge numbers of disaffected and first-time voters in the past two years. Those in political circles that dismiss the TEA Party as a fad or as simpletons do so at their own peril.
In his opening remarks, Democrat Jere Nash made the same mistake that the Dems keep making: he made light of the TEA Party, even going so far as to call the movement “a gift” to the Dems for future elections. His lack of understanding about who these people really are is why the Democrats will have a long road back in Mississippi.
To be sure, some of the TEA Party leadership in this state has become quite enamored with their new found celebrity. Some (and I highlight the word “some”) have found themselves standing atop the heap and think that this “revolution” affords them the right to be demanding, and more than a little indignant. Because it is such a loose confederation, there are a few shoot-first-and-ask-questions-later sensibilities at play, and many are not yet very adept at realizing that everything that comes at them through an email may not be the gospel truth. But, however unstable the movement, these are by far core conservative voters. The GOP must walk beside them, albeit gingerly.
Nash called into question Taggart’s opinion that North Mississippi’s First Congressional District turning back to the Republican’s during this cycle is a sign that many officials statewide will now be moving to the GOP in local elections. Nash rightfully asserted that this district was “Red” before when now Senator Wicker was the Congressman there, and local officials by and large were running as Democrats statewide then. But, what went unsaid is that Nash fails to recognize the significant shift that has occurred at the local grassroots level. He and other state Dems make light of TEA Party anger. If they hope to make it back to some semblance of power in his lifetime, they shouldn't.
The people that live and work in the rural communities throughout Mississippi every day, in towns like Ackerman, Maben, Leakesville, Silver Creek and Magnolia feel like they don’t have a voice. Many of these towns are not regular stops on the political circuit, and people who live and work in small towns are no longer accepting that they are left out of the equation. These are the people who have become active in ways that we haven’t seen before. New technology has allowed people to find like-minded friends within their own communities in ways that was not possible 10 years ago. It is loosely organized, but it is organized.
Another thing that is discounted by state Democrats is the number of small municipal officials who run as Democrats locally, but vote as Republicans. Poll any number of municipal or county officials in rural areas that have heavy Black Voting Age Population (BVAP) districts or wards, and you will find a large number that will tell you they “have to run Democrat.” The new found friends in the grassroots efforts that swept Mississippi last week can give these DINO’s the cover they need to join in on a year-long “coming out party” in 2011.
If Mississippi Democrats continue to stick their head in the sand, they will wake up and realize the world has changed around them. In fact, it’s already begun. Grassroots organization has changed with the dawn of Social Media. With state elections and redistricting around the corner, and a highly motivated base of new conservative voters there is a lot on the line. In light of all this, referring to conservative voters and TEA Party Members as “ignorant”, as State Democrat Leader Jamie Franks did a few weeks ago, even insinuating it, as Nash did last night, is not good strategy.
Last night I attended a lecture by Andy Taggart and Jere Nash at Millsaps. The lecture was part of Millsaps Art and Lecture Series, something I was completely unaware of until late last week. That’s when I found out about this particular appearance by the two proprietors of the Red/Blue Review. Andy and Jere have grown their partnership into quite the informative franchise, with books, a popular blog and a regular weekly appearance on WLBT. Last night’s lecture had a particular focus on analyzing the elections from last week, and a look ahead to Mississippi’s 2011 statewide elections.
I was somewhat disappointed to find that I and only a few others were easily the youngest in the room of about 50 people. I won’t go into detail except to say that I am firmly planted now in the category of “middle-age.” With the exception of my 18-year old son, there appeared to be no one under the age of 25 in the room, and only a few that may have been under 40.
This is a sad state of affairs. Where are all the young Political Science majors? Where are the same young people that are easily found mulling about and schmoozing with cocktail in hand at any number of political fundraising parties? Where are the young professionals? The answer to that question may also give an idea of why, even in a huge turnout year for mid-term elections, we still have an abysmal number of actual voters participating in the process. Citizen engagement drives the debate, and drives participation by people who will be true public servants.
The lack of citizen-representatives, and the continuing progression towards exclusivity in party-centric ideas was part of the reason for a huge backlash this year from the TEA party, 9-12 groups and other grassroots efforts. The movement has registered huge numbers of disaffected and first-time voters in the past two years. Those in political circles that dismiss the TEA Party as a fad or as simpletons do so at their own peril.
In his opening remarks, Democrat Jere Nash made the same mistake that the Dems keep making: he made light of the TEA Party, even going so far as to call the movement “a gift” to the Dems for future elections. His lack of understanding about who these people really are is why the Democrats will have a long road back in Mississippi.
To be sure, some of the TEA Party leadership in this state has become quite enamored with their new found celebrity. Some (and I highlight the word “some”) have found themselves standing atop the heap and think that this “revolution” affords them the right to be demanding, and more than a little indignant. Because it is such a loose confederation, there are a few shoot-first-and-ask-questions-later sensibilities at play, and many are not yet very adept at realizing that everything that comes at them through an email may not be the gospel truth. But, however unstable the movement, these are by far core conservative voters. The GOP must walk beside them, albeit gingerly.
Nash called into question Taggart’s opinion that North Mississippi’s First Congressional District turning back to the Republican’s during this cycle is a sign that many officials statewide will now be moving to the GOP in local elections. Nash rightfully asserted that this district was “Red” before when now Senator Wicker was the Congressman there, and local officials by and large were running as Democrats statewide then. But, what went unsaid is that Nash fails to recognize the significant shift that has occurred at the local grassroots level. He and other state Dems make light of TEA Party anger. If they hope to make it back to some semblance of power in his lifetime, they shouldn't.
The people that live and work in the rural communities throughout Mississippi every day, in towns like Ackerman, Maben, Leakesville, Silver Creek and Magnolia feel like they don’t have a voice. Many of these towns are not regular stops on the political circuit, and people who live and work in small towns are no longer accepting that they are left out of the equation. These are the people who have become active in ways that we haven’t seen before. New technology has allowed people to find like-minded friends within their own communities in ways that was not possible 10 years ago. It is loosely organized, but it is organized.
Another thing that is discounted by state Democrats is the number of small municipal officials who run as Democrats locally, but vote as Republicans. Poll any number of municipal or county officials in rural areas that have heavy Black Voting Age Population (BVAP) districts or wards, and you will find a large number that will tell you they “have to run Democrat.” The new found friends in the grassroots efforts that swept Mississippi last week can give these DINO’s the cover they need to join in on a year-long “coming out party” in 2011.
If Mississippi Democrats continue to stick their head in the sand, they will wake up and realize the world has changed around them. In fact, it’s already begun. Grassroots organization has changed with the dawn of Social Media. With state elections and redistricting around the corner, and a highly motivated base of new conservative voters there is a lot on the line. In light of all this, referring to conservative voters and TEA Party Members as “ignorant”, as State Democrat Leader Jamie Franks did a few weeks ago, even insinuating it, as Nash did last night, is not good strategy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











